6 Reasons Mars Hill Church Will Be Gone by End of This Year

1. The Math

MHC was $650K upside down in August. That was 2 months ago. The banks will foreclose on them since they’ve lost many more people (a.k.a. giving units) since then. Do the math.

2. The Elite

The cultural elite have turned on Driscoll. Former insiders have laid siege around MHC. Their numbers are growing. They’re not leaving. Like Sun Tzu says “the one incalculable in war is the will of the people”. Driscoll has no defenders left.

3. The Money

Many Americans, including many Christian Americans, do their most serious worshiping at the altar of consumerism. Moral issues like gay rights, abortion or adultery may upset them but money moves them.  Some rich ex member will bring a lawsuit for fraudulent use of funds.

4. The Leak

They committed the unpardonable sin by using “helpless” orphans in Ethiopia to raise money to pay off Driscoll’s WoodWay Mansion. Then they hid the memo. Then someone leaked it. Current staffers have lost confidence and are wanting to clear their conscience.

5. The Addict

Just like an addict, Driscoll has let his church take the hits for him while he “reflects” in his bunker. He hides while his church dies. Mars Hill deserves to disappear. There are no leaders left to lead anymore. They followed their king over the cliff.

6. The History 

Barbara Tuchman wrote; “history is a series of miscalculations”. Smarter people than Driscoll have been caught by history. Just before the fall comes the proud face. Disgraced Ex President Richard Nixon said it best, “I’m no crook” and then… he was gone.

Why I Protested and Why I’m Done

Brian McLaren is one of the Christian leaders I respect and admire the most. He has been made a lightning rod for many people simply because he loves young leaders and refuses to “throw them under the bus” when they say things that make life uncomfortable for him. He is one of the most honest followers of Jesus I know.

Unlike his many bible defending critics, Brian is very very reluctant to criticize others so when he does it’s a pretty serious deal in my mind. He and I became friends around 2000. He came to Seattle for a visit and I drove him around. I’ll never forget him mentioning meeting with Driscoll and saying “there’s something wrong with that guy” I recorded that and remembered it when I ran into a number of comments Driscoll made about McLaren in public. That’s when Driscoll got on “my list”

Around 2006 I was painting Paul and Rachelle Chapman’s house (that’s my day job). Rachelle is a ministry colleague and Paul is a friend. They were both raised in Christian homes and went to Regent for their graduate degrees. They’re smart sincere followers of Jesus. While I was painting, Paul started asking me if I would ever be willing to protest Driscoll, specifically for misogynistic statements that were generally debasing of women and ungodly for a leader to make in public. This was the Ted Haggard incident where Pastor Driscoll inferred that if Gayle Haggard had been more sexually available to her husband, he may not have been tempted to have gay sex and use methamphetamines. (true story – google it)

Paul and I organized an online group called People Against Fundamentalism because we see Driscoll as the poster boy for neo fundamentalism (all his fundamentalist denials notwithstanding) Like they say, if it quacks like a duck…
We set a date and published our demands. Then the phone started ringing for interviews with the Seattle Times and KIRO Radio etc.

As the Sunday we’d chosen to protest drew near we got a call from Driscolls camp asking for a private meeting. Paul attended and several other veteran Christians pastors from the Northwest (who can identify themselves here is they so choose). I chose to stay behind the scenes since I wasn’t pastoring and had not been attending church since 2000. To a person these long time Christian leaders told me that “there’s something broken in that guy”, he couldn’t stop talking about how difficult it was to lead a large church which didn’t particularly endear him to my friends. Leif Moi (now fired) was with him ostensibly as his security person which also served to reinforce the tough guy image Driscoll had already successful created around himself.

In that meeting Driscoll agreed to apologize to women (one of our demands) if we would call off the protest. We agreed and he gave what can only be called a “political apology” where you refrain from directly apologizing someone you actually insulted and instead apologize to everyone who might have been offended. It’s a tried and true tactic in national politics, which Driscoll now employs on a seemingly monthly basis. This was my first time watching Driscoll use private meetings to get out of public trouble but it would not be the last.

Instead of protesting we pivoted and held up signs saying Thank You Rev Driscoll for Apologizing. There were two of us and about 15 others joined us for that thank you party. Several people from Mars Hill came out to talk with us. Some of them were security people and some were elders and deacons. One of the elders was Paul Petry who in response to our protest was quoted in the paper as saying “Driscoll honors women”. He was fired about 6 months later.

A few years later Driscoll came out with his famous video rant against the best selling book The Shack (which unlike his faux bestseller Real Marriage, “earned” its #1 ranking on the NYT bestseller list as in 19 million in 7 years). Since I’m a friend of the author, Paul Young I asked the two of them to meet in Seattle in public to discuss their differences. Paul immediately agreed, Driscoll went silent. On the appointed day Paul and I and about 100 curious people showed up at Sandy Browns First Methodist Church in downtown Seattle. Driscoll did not. We had a great time taking questions from the audience.

After the meeting Driscoll’s camp in keeping with insulating the “man of god” “reached out” and said Driscoll would be willing to meet with Paul privately (are you seeing a pattern?) However Paul would have to come to Driscolls office and meet with him there. Paul had returned home to Portland but nonetheless drove back up to Seattle a few days later to meet Driscoll (his junior) in his office in Seattle. Driscoll promised to not diss the book anymore (which was of no concern to Paul since Driscolls rant only served to draw more attention to the book ultimately driving it onto the list of the 100 most popular books in history) Paul went hoping to make a connection so that in the future Driscoll will know Paul is safe to talk with.

Fast forward 7 years to 2014. Paul Petry and I became friends and he introduced me to Rob Smith. Rob, like me, is a provocateur but unlike me he is also a former Mars Hill insider given his status of being shunned by Driscoll for calling BS when Paul Petry was put through one of Driscolls ecclesiastical kangaroo courts. Rob invited me to a group of ex insiders who asked me to join them in protesting their former church. Those who had been opposite sides seven years earlier were about to join forces and do it all over again. What type of leader would push these former ideological opponents to stand together?

After the protest this weekend it became apparent that the role I served as placeholder is done. There is now an activist base of resistance against Driscoll led by his former close friends, allies and co planters. Rob Smith, Judy Abolafya and Paul and Jonna Petry are qualified, capable and now motivated to lead this Driscoll Awareness Campaign to its next logical place, which is to gain the partnership of some influential pastors who will call Driscoll out and ask for his resignation. This will not be easy but it is inevitable.

I took on this challenge as a result of feeling compelled by The Holy Spirit. I never asked anyone to join me and kept my questions about others passivity to myself. I am fine forgiving Driscoll as long as he is fired or removed or resigns from his role of influence in the church as part of that forgiveness. There are some sins that require people to “bring forth fruits meet for repentance” KJV (sorry it’s the one I memorized) this is one of those sins. I am astounded at the fear leaders have of Driscoll and appalled at how little Christians care about their reputation with nonbelievers in the Seattle area. I’m speechless. I’ve learned a lot about the condition of the Church and I’m wondering about a lot of things.

Driscoll is an addict. Quit expecting him to respond normally or with empathy. Not going to happen. He will either hit bottom or sabotage himself and his future in a manner that finally forces people who are dependent upon him for their incomes and identity to fire him and save him from himself.

I appreciate the insiders who have allowed me access to their group. It was an honor and I wish you the best.

Driscoll Throws Jesus Under Bus

It’s hard (but entertaining) to watch addicts go down.

Yes in my opinion Driscoll’s presenting problem is not theology, ecclesiology or even the lowest hanging fruit of all… misogyny. Driscoll’s core problem is that he’s an untreated addict. His mix seems to be a cocktail of sex, religion and narcissism. He acts like a little kid who grew up poor and swore to never go back to that lifestyle (which might explain The Million Dollar Home he hopes no helicopter locates). He carries himself and talks with the swagger only a gang leader could cultivate.

His sermon this past Sunday is an example. He actually threw Jesus under the bus in an attempt to find a way to beg for mercy since his standard theology (God Hates You) has little if any mercy available. He was scrambling so much that even his normal yes men elders decided to take matters into their own hands and delete 6 minutes of his live sermon lest Driscoll be caught teaching error (note to MHC elders – that cow left the barn years ago).

Thanks to the intrawebs you can read the deleted section here. It’s not really that big of a deal. Shoot, he almost made Jesus look normal.

Why now? He’s running out of room to hide. He’s scrambling. He’s having to make up new theologies to cover his patterns. Now it’s suddenly ok to make mistakes like gaming the New York Times best seller list. That’s not sin, that’s just a kid not knowing how to hit the ball correctly – you could almost hear him saying “give me a break you guys – I’m just a little kid” – This is very similar to the bargaining phase some people go through when facing death. Maybe Driscoll is hearing his end coming and wants to hold if off as long as possible.(Reminds one of Clinton) He’s nothing if not savvy and brazen. Guys like Driscoll are masters at bargaining.

 

 

Why I Would’ve Followed Mark Driscoll

By Jim Henderson

In an ocean of tolerance we desperately seek an island of certainty

I got “saved” in 1968 at St. Luke’s Episcopal Church in Ballard, which is not exactly the kind of church or neighborhood where you’d expect to find a revival going on. Nevertheless three nights a week scores of young people “went forward” to accept Christ as their personal savior and also renounce astrology, Satan, pre marital sex, drugs, long hair and (remember Bono was only 8 years old at the time) rock and roll. It was the beginning of The Jesus People movement.

Forty- five years later another revival of sorts has been transpiring in the exact same neighborhood and the church this time is anything but Episcopalian, Mars Hill is a non-denominational church that meets in a huge warehouse in Ballard. The revivalist, Mark Driscoll is more pugilist than priest. No clerical collar but lots of cockiness.

Long hair is ok, rock and roll is required but everything else on my do-not-do list is still out. This is the church I wish I could have joined when I got saved. Driscoll is so similar to the people I got saved with. We were on-fire and quite certain the rest of the church wasn’t. We spent our days “witnessing” and “ preaching” in bars, cars and parks.

By the early seventies, the Northwest version of the Jesus People movement would be hijacked by a group called The Children of God who’s super-serious about-Jesus leader was named Moses. Ultimately Moses would be exposed to be what today we commonly call a sex addict.

Another high control group, known as the “Shepherding movement,” hijacked many of the lets-go-back-to-church crowd of the Jesus People movement. The Shepherding movement leaders would tell their people when they could leave a church, who they should marry and in some cases when they should have sex.

Both movements died an early death but many of their victims are very much alive. Many have left the church and Jesus.

High control leaders like these lack the ability to “put the brakes on” their irrational ideas. They love the risk the chase and the fight.

Bill Clinton comes to mind.

Imagine being elected President of the United States. Now imagine looking in the official bathroom mirror of The White House and saying, “ I’m going to stop having sex with women I’m not married to for the next 8 years.” Now imagine breaking that promise by having sex with a twenty four year old intern right in The White House. Now imagine being caught and going on national TV and lying to the entire nation “I never had sexual relations with that woman.” That’s a high control leader.

Which brings me to why I would have followed Driscoll. He is a man and like many in his well-stated target demographic – young men from broken homes – my parents had divorced when I was ten and my dad left. I grew up with all women and no men. See the connection? Driscoll offers me Jesus PLUS a dad figure. The church becomes my real family and since it is comprised of someone who is more akin to an older brother/gang leader/tough guy for Jesus, I find a home.  However, I lack the one thing I desperately need to “see through” this older brother/gang leader/tough guy for Jesus – life experience. I contain a full tank of exactly what he needs to grab my attention – idealism.  Thus, I become a sitting duck for Driscoll Style Christianity.

My attraction to Driscoll is explained, but why Seattle, why does this city provide such a ripe market for his version of Christianity?

Driscoll is not a brilliant theologian. Driscoll is a brilliant marketer. He has the gene for reading people and social groups. He knows that many young people in Seattle lack direction. He knows that most liberal churches in the city are incapable of providing that direction. They’re too hung up on being fair, egalitarian and tolerant.

If you are a young person raised in Seattle, odds are you came from a liberal leaning home. When your two very hip and tolerant parents divorce it causes you to ask “why”? Lacking life experience and looking for relief from your pain you gravitate to the opposite of what they told you, which in my case and thousands of young people currently attracted to Mars Hill Church was that good old black and white Old Time Religion. When you can authorize the black and white with The Bible, and then deliver it with the forcefulness of Driscoll’s gift of oratory, you have a very powerful tool with which to control people.

When we feel adrift in an ocean of tolerance we desperately seek an island of certainty.  Which is what Driscoll has landed upon and is now spreading. He continues to do what his high control forebears have done before him. Consolidate power, cut off disloyal former loyalists and leverage his personal identity with The Brand.

Why am I calling Driscoll’s behavior out in public? I believe Christian leaders who publicly leverage their platform can be held responsible on that same platform. You can’t have it both ways. You can’t expound your ideas via speaking, tweeting or writing and then accuse people of not following Matthew 18 when they use those same public tools to call attention to your behaviors. If you don’t like those rules, all you have to do is stay off the stage.

Back in the 1970s, most of us never had an older person in the faith tell us the truth about these destructive patterns of dogmatic leadership. We had no idea that the Christian faith was not as black and white as Moses (or now Driscoll) preach. Our elders were trained to err on the side of not making waves because it would make the church look bad in the eyes of outsiders. It’s called circling the wagons. That’s what Christians do, especially when they belong to a place like Mars Hill Church. They circle the wagons around their leader and take a bullet for him and he lets them.

I’m done circling the wagons. Driscoll is way to visible to ignore. If Christians won’t listen then at least I want to go on record with the thousands of Non Christian’s who have their image of Jesus shaped by Driscoll’s high control leadership antics. I’m appalled at how little Christian leaders seem to care about the negative impressions Driscoll makes upon the people Jesus misses most. Especially since Jesus was far more concerned about his reputation with Outsiders than he was with Insiders.

I recently interviewed a young leader who was once very very loyal to Driscoll. I asked him about his current involvement with church and he said; “I’m not involved”. I then asked him about how he feels about God and he said; “I try not to think about it”.

If this pattern keeps up Driscoll will end up producing more Atheists than Christians.

No one has the right to rob young people of Jesus, not even the guy with the biggest church.